Skip to main content
Exam guide & reading text

Accessibility Walks, Reusable Packaging & School PodcastPart 1

"Accessibility Walks, Reusable Packaging & School Podcast" is a Cambridge C2 Proficiency Listening Part 1 practice exam (Multiple Choice (Short)). Effective listening at C2 requires tracking attitude, implied meaning and discourse markers, not just factual detail. Listen once for gist, then focus on the specific questions. Use the transcript in this guide after your attempt to study linking devices, stress patterns and how speakers signal opinion or contrast.

Read the full Part 1 strategy guide →

Transcript

EXTRACT ONE [NORA]: Are you still doing that accessibility walk tomorrow, Tom? [TOM]: I nearly backed out. I assumed everyone would know planning rules and be able to say exactly what should be done. Claire, who runs it, said that was the wrong idea: they want regular street users to notice obstacles professionals can miss. [NORA]: I thought the early start was the problem. [TOM]: I moved my work around it, and we walk in pairs. I was more worried that I would have nothing useful to add. [NORA]: So what happens? [TOM]: We record small things: a sign hidden by a tree, a bench narrowing a pavement, a crossing button you cannot reach. I used to dismiss that beside rebuilding a junction. But after the last walk, several changes were made within weeks. The notes give people responsible for a place evidence to fix things they might otherwise overlook. It is not about deciding which major project gets funding. EXTRACT TWO [PAULA]: Has your department started using those returnable lunch containers? [KARIM]: Yes, though I argued against it at first. I was not worried that colleagues would fail to return them: the mug system already worked reasonably well. I pictured facilities staff having to clean, count and chase containers on top of everything else. [PAULA]: I thought you objected to the purchase cost. [KARIM]: That came up, but it was not my main concern. They now use numbered crates behind reception, so staff move one crate at the end of the day. [PAULA]: Has it saved much? [KARIM]: Not obviously. We still order food for meetings, and individually wrapped lunches have not vanished. But people have started asking why we ordered so many in the first place. Some teams plan together or choose cafés that collect their own containers. The main change has been in everyday habits, not in the accounts. EXTRACT THREE [MARCO]: I listened to the rough cut of your podcast. It sounded very natural. [AISHA]: That is because I stopped trying to make it too polished. At first, I removed pauses and changes of direction because I thought they made people sound uncertain. Later I realised those were often the moments when they were working out what they genuinely thought. Cutting them made the conversations flatter. [MARCO]: I had assumed we would need someone with broadcasting experience before recording anything useful. [AISHA]: That was your concern, not mine. [MARCO]: What about episode two? More research on the school-meal issue? [AISHA]: That was my original plan. There are plenty of reports and survey results. [MARCO]: Make a short trailer first and ask listeners what they want clarified. Their questions may be more useful than ours before we choose the next angle. [AISHA]: Yes. We should do that before deciding who to interview.

Questions summary

You hear two friends talking about a community accessibility walk.

Q1: Why had Tom initially considered withdrawing from the walk?

Q2: What conclusion does Tom now draw about the walks?

You hear two colleagues discussing a reusable-packaging scheme at work.

Q1: What practical concern made Karim doubtful about the scheme?

Q2: What longer-term effect does Karim value most?

You hear two students talking about producing a school podcast.

Q1: Why did Aisha alter her approach to editing?

Q2: What does Marco encourage Aisha to do before planning the next episode?