Skip to main content
Exam guide & reading text

The Last StationPart 5

"The Last Station" is a Cambridge C2 Proficiency Reading Part 5 practice exam (Multiple Choice). This paper rewards close reading, inference and awareness of text organisation. Work under timed conditions when possible — the official Reading paper allows 90 minutes across Parts 1–7. After completing the exercise, use review mode to understand why each answer is correct and note any vocabulary or discourse patterns you missed.

Read the full Part 5 strategy guide →

Reading text

The station at Merefield had no ticket office, no vending machine and, after six in the evening, no one who could reasonably be described as staff. There was a timetable behind scratched glass and a loudspeaker that announced delays in a voice so faint that passengers leaned towards it as though listening to a relative. I had arrived early for the last train because I was meeting my brother in the city, and because arriving early was easier than admitting that I did not know what I would say when I saw him.

We had not quarrelled in the dramatic sense. There had been no final sentence, no door closed with particular force. Instead, we had allowed a disagreement about our father’s house to become a series of postponements. My brother wanted to sell it quickly; I wanted time to go through its contents. Both positions had seemed reasonable when stated separately. The difficulty was that each implied a different idea of what the house had been. For him, it was a responsibility that had outlived its owner. For me, it was a kind of evidence, though I could not have said of what.

The platform was almost empty except for a woman in a red coat and a boy who kept walking to the edge, looking down the track, then returning to his mother without comment. They seemed to be performing the same small action in different moods: he with impatience, she with resignation. I found myself watching them more closely than was polite. At home, I had spent the afternoon opening drawers and making piles: papers to keep, papers to ask about, papers I could not yet decide were papers at all. The act had produced no revelation. It had merely made the rooms look temporarily dismantled.

A message from my brother appeared on my phone: Running late. Don’t wait around if the train goes. I read it twice. The practical instruction was clear enough, but its tone seemed to contain every conversation we had avoided. I began composing a reply, deleted it, then wrote that I was already at the station. This was untrue; I had been there only ten minutes. Yet I wanted him to imagine me waiting, perhaps because waiting seemed more dignified than being unable to begin.

The delay was announced at last. Fifteen minutes, according to the loudspeaker, although the woman in the red coat gave a small laugh that suggested she had heard such promises before. The boy asked whether the train might not come at all. “It usually does,” she said. I admired the precision of usually. It offered comfort without pretending to certainty. My father had disliked such wording. He preferred decisions that could be declared complete: the hedge cut, the account closed, the holiday booked. Even his apologies, when they came, had sounded like conclusions.

I thought then of a receipt I had found that afternoon, folded inside an old map. It recorded the repair of a bicycle thirty years earlier. There was nothing sentimental about it, and yet I had put it in the pile marked keep. Not because it was important in itself, but because it disturbed the neatness of the story I had been telling myself. My father, whom I remembered as decisive and self-contained, had once kept a receipt for a repair so ordinary that it could have belonged to anyone. Perhaps he had forgotten it was there. Perhaps he had kept it for the same reason I was keeping it now: not as proof, but as permission to delay a verdict. The thought was unsettling because it made my sorting seem less like care and more like an attempt to turn hesitation into a principle.

The train arrived almost half an hour late. The woman and boy boarded first, and I saw him turn in the doorway to look back along the platform, as if he expected the waiting itself to have changed something. On the journey, my brother sent another message. He was still delayed, but could meet me the following morning. I felt a brief, unreasonable relief. It was not that I wanted to avoid him. I wanted the conversation to occur after I had learned to distinguish between what I was preserving and what I was merely postponing. The train carried me away from Merefield before I had managed to decide whether that distinction was possible.

Questions summary

Question 1

The writer’s early arrival at Merefield is presented as

  • an attempt to ensure that the last train would not be missed.
  • a way of making the meeting with the brother feel less unequal.
  • an opportunity to distract from the house by watching other travellers.
  • a means of turning lack of preparation into the more respectable act of waiting.

Question 2

The disagreement about the house persisted because the brothers

  • remembered their father’s wishes in incompatible ways.
  • treated the same place as a different kind of burden and evidence.
  • disagreed about whether its contents had any financial value.
  • had allowed practical difficulties to determine a personal decision.

Question 3

The writer’s sorting of the house has the effect of

  • exposing how many possessions had been kept without a clear purpose.
  • making the task of deciding what to retain feel emotionally detached.
  • showing the scale of what remains unresolved without resolving it.
  • providing a reliable basis for the coming discussion with the brother.

Question 4

The word *usually* appeals to the writer because it

  • offers reassurance while refusing a confidence it cannot justify.
  • confirms that the woman is more familiar with the station than the boy.
  • turns an unreliable announcement into a shared joke between passengers.
  • recalls the father’s preference for decisions that could not be revised.

Question 5

The receipt causes the writer to question

  • whether an ordinary object needs an obvious historical explanation to be kept.
  • how accurately the father’s practical habits have been remembered.
  • whether papers should be separated from possessions before any sale.
  • whether keeping things is an act of care or a disguised way of deferring judgement.

Question 6

The final message brings relief chiefly because it

  • suggests that the brother has already accepted a delay in selling the house.
  • postpones a conversation until the writer can better identify what is at stake.
  • frees the writer from responsibility for deciding what the house contains.
  • confirms that the journey has clarified the father’s character.